TESTING OF SINGLE VARIANCE
TESTING OF SINGLE
VARIANCE
If we want to test variance of the
population with that of sample variance then this is useful. If we denote that
is variance of population and S2 is for
the sample then the null and alternative hypotheses are written as below.

H0:
S2 =

Ha: S2 ≠

For one tailed test the alternative hypothesis will
be
Ha: S² >
or

Ha:
S² <

The logic behind this test is that
here we want to control not only mean but variance also. The testing of
population mean and sample mean is carried out using t-test. But here we want
to test variance of population whose size is unknown with the variance of
sample (here ‘n’ is known).
Example:
1. The
manufacturer of golf ball wants to control the variance of weight of balls.
2. The
variation in the thickness of silicon disc is controlled by the firm.
3. The
gap between wheel teeth gear should be within specification limit. Higher and
lower gap can cause problem in performance of gear.
Formula:

This formula is solved by finding
out X2- statistics from the variances. Here (n-1) is degree of
freedom for the sample.
The
testing Criteria:
1.
If alternative
hypothesis is S2 ≠
ten

X²Cal> X²α/2 then reject null hypothesis. However X²Cal< X²(1- α/2) then also reject H0.
2.
For S² <
type
alternative hypothesis it is necessary to find out X Critical value
using X²(1-α). If X²Cal< X²(1- α) reject null hypothesis.

3.
For S² >
If type alternative hypothesis find out X²α value which is critical value.

If X²Cal> X²α th3en rejects null hypothesis.
Graph
↓:
In
some cases it is expected that the variance should not be more than a
particular value. In that case we have to formulate the null hypothesis as H0 : S2 £
against Ha:
S² >
. In the case of quality management, the precision
as measured by variance of an instrument is not more than 0.16. Here if we have
taken 13 measurements of the instrument on the same subject as 2.5, 2.3, 2.4,
2.3, 2.5, 2.7, 2.5, 2.7, 2.5, 2.6, 2.6, 2.7, 2.5. Let us carry out the hypothesis
testing at 1 % level of significance to test whether the variance observed is
not more than 0.16. Here the expectation 0.16 is the variance of population
that should be mentioned in the null hypothesis at
.



H0 : S2 £ 0.16 against Ha:
S² > 0.16
Let us find out variance of the given sample by
using formula:

This
formula is used here because of given numbers are small and there is no
possibility that the mean of the given numbers is integer.
X
|
X2
|
2.5
|
6.25
|
2.3
|
5.29
|
2.4
|
5.76
|
2.3
|
5.29
|
2.5
|
6.25
|
2.7
|
7.29
|
2.5
|
6.25
|
2.7
|
7.29
|
2.5
|
6.25
|
2.6
|
6.76
|
2.6
|
6.76
|
2.7
|
7.29
|
2.5
|
6.25
|
32.8
|
82.98
|



χ2cal=
=



The
critical value of the χ2 at 1% of level of significance and 13-1=12
degree of freedom is 21.0261. As the calculated value is lesser than critical
value we accept null hypothesis. Thus the variance of the instrument is not
more than 0.16.
Question
1: A manufacturer of golf balls wants to
control the weight of the ball in such a way that the variance of weight should
not be more than 1.8 mg². For this purpose he has taken 15 samples of the balls
which resulted into variance of 2.8 mg². Is this sufficient to reject the claim
of manufacturer at 5% level of significance?
The
null and alternative hypotheses are given as H0 : S2 £ 1.8 against Ha: S² > 1.8. n= 15.
Here S²= 2.8mg² and
=
1.8mg². Putting into following formula:



χ2cal=21.78
Critical
value of the
at 15-1=14 degree of freedom and level of
significance 5% is 23.6848. As calculated value is lesser than critical value
we accept null hypothesis and hereby assume that the variance of the sample
i.e. 2.8 is approximately equal to 1.8mg². In other words the difference
between sample variance and expected variance is insignificant at 5 % level of
significance.

Question
2: The diameter of the shaft should have
precision at each cross section measured longitudinally. The variance allowed
is 0.012mm². The sample of 20 reveals that standard deviation of the diameter
is 0.12mm. Give your opinion whether the variation is within limit?
Given:
= 0.012mm²,
S=0.12

S²=
0.12²=0.0144mm², n=20
H0 : S2 =
=
0.012 , Ha: S² <




χ2cal=22.80
χ2table
at 5% level of significance means we
expect this at 0.995 probability to be within limit. Thus for 0.995 area and
degree of freedom = (20-1) =19 the value of
χ2critical
= 10.117.
As the calculated value of χ2
is greater than critical value (10.117)
we reject the null hypothesis. Here we expect that the variance of the shaft
will not in the limit.
Question
3: The client purchaser suspects that the
gap between fan hole and shaft is more than specific limit as measured at 8
directions. The variance allowed is 0.036mm². Following measurements are taken
by the representative.
22.6,
23.1, 22.6, 22.8, 22.7, 22.8, 22.6, 22.9, 23.2, 22.5, 22.5, 22.6, 22.4, 22.7,
22.5, 22.6, 22.4, 22.9, 22.7, 22.6. Test
the Hypothesis that the variance is more than limit. Use 5 % level of
significance.
H0 : S2 £
=0.036 against Ha:
S² > 


Let
us find out S2 using formula of deviation
from assumed mean. Assume a = 20.
X
|
d=(X-a)=(X-20)
|
d^2
|
22.6
|
0.6
|
0.36
|
23.1
|
1.1
|
1.21
|
22.6
|
0.6
|
0.36
|
22.8
|
0.8
|
0.64
|
22.7
|
0.7
|
0.49
|
22.8
|
0.8
|
0.64
|
22.6
|
0.6
|
0.36
|
22.9
|
0.9
|
0.81
|
23.2
|
1.2
|
1.44
|
22.5
|
0.5
|
0.25
|
22.5
|
0.5
|
0.25
|
22.6
|
0.6
|
0.36
|
22.4
|
0.4
|
0.16
|
22.7
|
0.7
|
0.49
|
22.5
|
0.5
|
0.25
|
22.6
|
0.6
|
0.36
|
22.4
|
0.4
|
0.16
|
22.9
|
0.9
|
0.81
|
22.7
|
0.7
|
0.49
|
22.6
|
0.6
|
0.36
|
Total
|
13.7
|
10.25
|
d
bar =
=
= 0.685






χ2critical
at α =0.05 and degree of freedom i.e.
20-1=19. As the values in the table of χ2
gives right side probabilities hence we
should see this α =0.05. χ2critical
= 30.144.
As
the calculated value is lesser than critical value, we accept null hypothesis.
The variation 0.0455 can be assumed to be appropriate and equal to 0.036.
Question 1:
A
firm manufactures shaft expects that the length should be 150 mm. It is
observed that actual length varies more and less than the specifications. A
manager took random samples of 17 shafts and found that the variance is 15.00
Sq. mm. He now wants to establish variance and standard deviation limits of the
population with 95% confidence. Also wants to know the maximum error in the
shaft length that the manufacturing process can produce. Help him in finding
out.
Question 2:
A
large candy manufacturer produces packs of candy targeted to weight 52 grams. A
quality control manager was concerned that the variation in the actual weights
was larger than acceptable. That is, he was concerned that some packs weighed
significantly less than 52 grams and some weighed significantly more than 52
grams. In order to estimate σ the standard deviation of the weights of the
nominal 52 grams packs, he took a random sample of n = 10 packs off of the
factory line. The random sample yielded a sample variance of 4.2 grams.
i.
Use the random sample
to derive a 95 % confidence interval for σ. (Note: the interval is for σ not
σ²).
ii.
What assumptions did
you make about the sample in order to make your estimate?

Comments
Post a Comment